Not THAT offensive....

First and foremost, if you are offended easily, just know that I don't give a fuck.

Now, that I got that out of the way...

Modern society always looks at problems from the wrong perspective. I try to envision the world before man screwed it up with his technology, try to ponder on how man interacted with one another, try to see how social constructs would be different, and try to contemplate a world without written laws.

That is a very dangerous rabbit hole to travel within and I do not recommend it for the weak or timid. However, for those brave souls willing to venture outside their comfort zones, come on this journey to a very uncomfortable place...

... The setting is year 2 of man's existence. I don't care if you think we morphed from tadpoles or were glued together from dirt, today it's a moot point. Focus, is on man is alive and there are no written laws.

Man sees woman. Man is naked. Woman is naked. Man gets erection. Woman gets wet. Man and woman have sex. Fast-foward 200 years so we don't have to make this too awkward. World has several different families of mans and womans (Did that intentionally). Man2 from family 1 sees Woman2 from family B. Man2 is minimally "covered." Woman2 is minimally "covered." (J.Crew didn't existed so I'm not gonna say "clothed"). Man2 gets erection. Woman2 gets wet. Man2 and woman2 have sex.

Now, it both scenarios, because I put man/ woman and am speaking about the topic of sexual relations you are more than likely thinking about adults of consenting age. Though, the idea of "consent" and "adulthood" are both terms that find their origins within the realm of organized social structures and mainly those with written laws.

So, I'm going to be more specific, just to tamper with your mind. Man2 has experienced 12 winters and woman 2 has experienced 13 winters. By our calculations that would make them 12 years old and 13 y/o, respectfully.

Man2 and woman2 have sex again the next day- because they like it. Woman2 gets pregnant. They don't know that, because there's no ept first response. The next day, again, they have sex, because their world has no jobs; and they really enjoy it. Since they really enjoy sex with each other and know what each other like, they typically only have sex with each other. Plus, they like each others' smells and looks.

Fast-forward a year.

Man2 and woman2 now have their own little family with baby.

How long do you think baby will live with mommy and daddy? Until he's 18y/o? Younger?

Whatever you thought, you're wrong. He's not going anywhere. They're a family. We are community/ social creatures. They would kill him or cast him out of the community if he was a problem to the group, but other than that, he is with the family for life.

But the biggest focus is the age at when people are ready for sexual relations. The human body is able to handle the responsibility of procreation about the age of 11 for male and female. And in a world were there are no written laws, social taboos, or communal stigmas surrounding the concept of 11 year olds engaging in coitus, then that is exactly what they will do if the time and opportunity presents itself.

I could go on and cite multiple benefits that would present to a society but that would REALLY chafe your anus, so I will stop there and ask the question; "What real reason is there that the age of consent is 18?"

Disclaimer: I lost my virginity at 17 to a 22y/o. I'm not into 11y/o. Honestly, the only people that are probably into any 11 year old is another 11 year old. So don't think this is me trying to rationalize some pedo fantasy. (I know that's the first argument I'm going to get from the first pissed off dad, without a brain to defend our stupid laws).